Group Topic #2

Dunhuang under went many significant changes during the Tang dynasty. First off, it was during this period of time that China pulled back, leaving it under control of the Tibetans.  Under this leadership Buddhism seemed to flourish.  For example, we know that at one point there were at least 17 Buddhist monasteries and nunneries.

It hard to say how the Buddhist monks and nuns lived during this time.  Obviously we have records and doctrine’s on how they were supposed to live, but, as discussed in class these represented more of an ideal than historical truth.  By looking at old letters and census’ we are able to grasp a better understanding.  We can tell, by looking at past letters, that some monks went so far off of the path of the middle way, that they acted as money lenders, charging %10 interest.  This seems so improbable, but it seems that there did indeed exist Buddhist loan sharks.

Interestingly enough, some Buddhist temples also acted as staging grounds for local ‘fraternities’ or ‘soroities’ or sorts.  Obviously, much unlike today’s standards of fraternities, groups of men or women would meet at the temples forming clubs.  They paid membership fees, swore oaths to each other, took care of each other’s funeral costs and reprimanded each other for unfortunate behavior.  Most likely the groups of women would have consisted of nuns.

Although these are just two examples, we are able to view a past much different from the idealized one of official doctrines, and writtings. Also, through the later example we see how much of the secular lifestyles of the inhabitants of Dunhuang centered around the religious centres and also the religion itself.

One Response to “Group Topic #2”

  1. Interesting. I actually didn’t know that Buddhist monks were loan sharks too. Haha, harshhh~, the debtors must have been perplexed since, on top of owing money with a pretty high interest rate, owing a Buddhist monastery or trying to avoid repaying their debt would probably be seen as acquiring bad merit/karma. With regards to renunciation, the monks and nuns didn’t seem to follow the strict dharmas. As I have voiced in my blog, I believe there were many that only followed the ‘easier’ dharmas and used religion as a scapegoat.

    I also find it a little confusing as to why there were so many different monasteries in one region, what was the need for them? Do you think that each was so different in their teachings that they needed separate monasteries? Or was it strictly a question of geography?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.